Onto-Phenomenology of Spatial Memory in Adumbrations
Abstract
As we turn to the lived experience of memory, we are confronted with an eerie and enigmatic possibility: the possibility to remember what we ourselves never lived. How to explain phenomenologically this enigmatic but fundamental level of spatialized memory? I would like to come back to these issues in order to face yet another fundamental question: Does a phenomenology of spatialized memory require any onto-phenomenological concretizations?
References
BÉGOUT, B. (2005). La découverte du quotidien. Paris: Allia.
FUCHS, T. (2012). “Body memory and the Unconscious”. In: D. Lohmar and J. Brudziňska (eds.). Founding Psychoanalysis Phenomenologically. Phaenomenologica 199. Dordrecht et al: Springer, 69-82.
MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception. Eng. Trans: C. Smith. London & New York: Routledge.
— (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
— (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
TRIGG, D. (2012). The Memory of Place. Phenomenology of the Uncanny. Athens: Ohio University Press.
UMBELINO, L. A. (2016a). “Memory, Space, Oblivion”. In: Scott Davidson, Marc-Antoine Vallée (eds.). Hermeneutics and Phenomenology in Paul Ricoeur. XXX: Springer, 115-122.
— (2016b). “On the Ricoeurian Projet of a Hermeneutics of Space”. In: Andrzej Wiercinski (ed.). Hermeneutics - Ethics – Education. Zurich: Lit Verlag, 199-206.
— (2015). “Memory of the Body, Temptation of Space”. The European Legacy 20 (8): 844-851.
— (2013). “L’étoffe spatiale de la mémoire. Lectures de M. Merleau-Ponty et P. Ricœur”. Studia Phaenomenologica 13: 325-334.
— (2011). “Herméneutique, architecture et humanisation de l’espace”. Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses 91 (1): 67-82.
FUCHS, T. (2012). “Body memory and the Unconscious”. In: D. Lohmar and J. Brudziňska (eds.). Founding Psychoanalysis Phenomenologically. Phaenomenologica 199. Dordrecht et al: Springer, 69-82.
MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception. Eng. Trans: C. Smith. London & New York: Routledge.
— (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
— (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
TRIGG, D. (2012). The Memory of Place. Phenomenology of the Uncanny. Athens: Ohio University Press.
UMBELINO, L. A. (2016a). “Memory, Space, Oblivion”. In: Scott Davidson, Marc-Antoine Vallée (eds.). Hermeneutics and Phenomenology in Paul Ricoeur. XXX: Springer, 115-122.
— (2016b). “On the Ricoeurian Projet of a Hermeneutics of Space”. In: Andrzej Wiercinski (ed.). Hermeneutics - Ethics – Education. Zurich: Lit Verlag, 199-206.
— (2015). “Memory of the Body, Temptation of Space”. The European Legacy 20 (8): 844-851.
— (2013). “L’étoffe spatiale de la mémoire. Lectures de M. Merleau-Ponty et P. Ricœur”. Studia Phaenomenologica 13: 325-334.
— (2011). “Herméneutique, architecture et humanisation de l’espace”. Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses 91 (1): 67-82.
Published
2017-10-31
How to Cite
UMBELINO, Luís António.
Onto-Phenomenology of Spatial Memory in Adumbrations.
Phainomenon, [S.l.], n. 26, p. 185-194, oct. 2017.
ISSN 2183-0142.
Available at: <http://www.phainomenon-journal.pt/index.php/phainomenon/article/view/358>. Date accessed: 23 apr. 2024.
Issue
Section
Articles
